A distinctive editorial choice of this book is that it opens with the Lagrangian formulation of mechanics, instead of introducing the subject through Newton's laws. In other words, dynamics is presented from the start as a variational problem: the equations of motion emerge as conditions on the action functional, rather than being postulated as force laws.
Consider a trajectory \(q(t)\) and a small deviation \(\delta q(t)\). The corresponding deviation of the velocity is \(\delta \dot{q}(t)=\frac{d}{dt}\delta q(t)\). A first-order multivariable Taylor expansion of the Lagrangian around \((q,\dot{q},t)\) gives
Substituting into the action difference \(S[q+\delta q]-S[q]\) and keeping only terms linear in the deviation yields
Definition. The first variation \(\delta S\) is the linear part in \(\delta q\) and \(\delta \dot{q}\):
Intuitively, if the change in the action were strictly proportional to the deviation, then changing the sign of the deviation would change the sign of the action's change. But a minimum cannot behave that way: a perturbation cannot make the action larger in one direction and smaller in the opposite direction. Therefore, at a minimum the linear contribution must vanish, i.e. \(\delta S=0\) at first order for all admissible variations.
To proceed, focus on the second term in \(\delta S\). It has the form \(\int_{t_1}^{t_2} A(t)\,\frac{d}{dt}(\delta q)\,dt\). Applying integration by parts gives
In our case, \(A(t)=\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}}\). Hence
The boundary term vanishes because the variations are taken with fixed endpoints: \(\delta q(t_1)=\delta q(t_2)=0\). This condition expresses the idea that we compare paths that start and end at the same points in configuration space; only the intermediate shape of the path is allowed to vary. In that setting, \(\big[ \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}}\delta q \big]_{t_1}^{t_2}=0\).
I particularly like how the book motivates the notion of an inertial frame through simple symmetry statements about space.